Blog

EasyRepro Alternatives for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Testing

Published on
October 30, 2025
Rishabh Kumar
Marketing Lead

Learn why organizations are looking for EasyRepro alternatives and how Virtuoso QA outperforms other options with advanced, AI-driven test automation.

Why D365 Teams Are Looking for EasyRepro Alternatives

If you've implemented Microsoft's EasyRepro framework for Dynamics 365 testing, you've likely experienced this progression:

  • Week 1: "This open-source framework looks promising and it's built by Microsoft."
  • Month 2: "Why do tests keep breaking with every D365 update?"
  • Month 4: "Our QA team is spending 40% of their time maintaining tests instead of testing new features."
  • Month 6: "We need to evaluate EasyRepro alternatives."

You're not alone. While EasyRepro serves as Microsoft's official open-source testing framework for D365, thousands of teams discover that what works for basic automated testing doesn't scale for enterprise D365 implementations.

This guide examines why teams search for EasyRepro alternatives, evaluates the top solutions available, and provides a framework for choosing the right D365 test automation platform for your needs.

The Core Problems with EasyRepro for D365 Testing

1. Brittle Test Maintenance

EasyRepro relies on XPath selectors to identify D365 elements. When Microsoft releases D365 updates (twice yearly in April and October), UI changes break these selectors. Teams report 25-40% test failure rates after major D365 updates - not because functionality changed, but because element identifiers changed.

Real cost: A mid-size D365 implementation with 200 automated tests spends 60-80 hours after each update fixing broken selectors. That's 120-160 hours annually just maintaining existing coverage.

2. Steep Learning Curve

EasyRepro requires C# programming knowledge. While this gives technical flexibility, it creates bottlenecks:

  • Only developers can write tests
  • Business analysts can't validate test logic
  • New team members need weeks of ramp-up time
  • Test creation becomes a development project, not a QA activity

3. Limited Cross-Instance Reusability

EasyRepro tests are typically hardcoded to specific D365 environments. When organizations roll out D365 to multiple factories, regions, or subsidiaries, they rebuild tests for each instance because environment-specific configurations are embedded in test code.

Multi-instance reality: Companies with 5+ D365 instances report rebuilding 60-80% of test automation for each deployment. The same Order-to-Cash process gets automated five separate times.

4. No Built-In Self-Healing

When D365 UI elements change, EasyRepro tests fail. The framework provides no mechanism to automatically adapt to these changes. Every broken test requires manual developer intervention to identify the new selector, update the code, and redeploy.

5. Scaling Challenges

As test libraries grow beyond 100 tests, EasyRepro implementations face:

  • Slow execution times (serial execution is default)
  • Difficult test maintenance (finding and updating specific selectors across hundreds of tests)
  • No central asset library for reusable components
  • Version control complexity when multiple QA engineers work simultaneously

What to Look for in an EasyRepro Alternative

When evaluating D365 test automation alternatives, prioritize solutions that address EasyRepro's core limitations:

Essential Capabilities

1. Intelligent Element Identification

The alternative should identify D365 elements using AI-powered recognition that adapts when Microsoft changes the UI. Look for terms like "self-healing," "visual identification," or "intelligent locators."

2. Low-Code or No-Code Test Creation

Business users and QA analysts should be able to create and understand tests without C# programming. This democratizes test creation and speeds up coverage.

3. Multi-Instance Architecture

Tests should work across multiple D365 instances with configuration rather than code changes. The same Order-to-Cash test should deploy to Factory A in Germany and Factory B in Texas without rebuilding.

4. Pre-Built D365 Test Assets

The best alternatives include libraries of pre-built tests for common D365 processes (Order-to-Cash, Procure-to-Pay, Financial Close, etc.). This eliminates the "build from scratch" bottleneck.

5. Automatic Maintenance

When D365 updates, tests should adapt automatically or provide clear guidance on required changes. Manual selector hunting should be eliminated.

Top EasyRepro Alternatives for D365 Testing in 2025

EasyRepro vs Virtuoso QA

1. Virtuoso QA Composable Testing for D365 (Best Overall Alternative)

What it is: An AI-powered test automation platform with 700+ pre-built, configurable test assets specifically designed for Microsoft Dynamics 365.

Why teams switch from EasyRepro:

  • Pre-Built Test Library: Instead of building Order-to-Cash tests from scratch in C#, teams deploy pre-built tests that cover Finance, Supply Chain, Commerce, HR, and Project Operations modules. Configuration replaces coding.
  • AI Self-Healing: When D365 updates change UI elements, Virtuoso QA's AI automatically adapts tests. Teams report zero broken tests after D365 updates compared to 25-40% failure rates with EasyRepro.
  • Plain English Test Steps: Tests are written in natural language, not code. Business users can read and validate test logic. QA analysts can create tests without programming knowledge.
  • Multi-Instance Composability: Tests are modular and configurable. The same test library deploys across multiple D365 instances with environment-specific configuration, not code changes.

Deployment Timeline:

  • EasyRepro: 125+ days to build comprehensive coverage
  • Virtuoso QA Composable: Day 1 deployment of 700+ tests

Best for:

  • Organizations with multiple D365 instances
  • Teams spending >40% of QA time on test maintenance
  • Companies with limited C# development resources
  • Enterprises rolling out D365 globally

Pricing Model: Annual subscription based on D365 modules covered. Includes migration support from EasyRepro.

Discover how Virtuoso QA Composable simplifies Dynamics 365 testing with reusable, configurable test assets that scale quality assurance effortlessly:

2. Tosca (Tricentis Tosca)

What it is: Enterprise test automation platform with model-based testing for D365.

Strengths:

  • Robust test management capabilities
  • Model-based approach reduces maintenance
  • Strong integration with CI/CD pipelines
  • Established vendor with D365 expertise

Limitations vs. EasyRepro:

  • Expensive licensing (typically $15K-$30K per user annually)
  • Steep learning curve for model-based testing paradigm
  • Implementation typically requires consultants
  • Limited pre-built D365 test assets

Best for: Large enterprises with dedicated test automation teams and budget for premium tools.

3. Test Studio (Progress Telerik)

What it is: Commercial test automation tool with D365 capabilities.

Strengths:

  • Visual test recorder
  • Integrates with Azure DevOps
  • Lower price point than Tosca
  • Support for web and mobile testing

Limitations vs. EasyRepro:

  • Still requires technical skills for complex scenarios
  • Limited D365-specific features
  • Tests still break with D365 updates (traditional locator-based)
  • Manual maintenance overhead remains

Best for: Teams wanting a commercial alternative to open-source but with budget constraints.

4. Selenium with Custom Framework

What it is: Building a custom D365 test framework using Selenium WebDriver.

Strengths:

  • Complete flexibility and control
  • Large Selenium community for support
  • Can integrate any technology stack
  • Free open-source licensing

Limitations vs. EasyRepro:

  • Requires significant development investment
  • Same brittle XPath selector issues as EasyRepro
  • No D365-specific features without custom development
  • Maintenance burden increases with scale
  • Essentially rebuilding EasyRepro with more work

Best for: Organizations with strong automation development teams and very specific technical requirements.

5. Microsoft RSAT (Regression Suite Automation Tool)

What it is: Microsoft's official test automation tool included with D365 licenses.

Strengths:

  • Free with D365 license
  • Direct Microsoft support
  • Integrated with D365 Task Recorder
  • Works natively with D365 architecture

Limitations vs. EasyRepro:

  • Limited to recorded UI interactions
  • Time-consuming test creation process
  • Breaks with D365 UI changes (same as EasyRepro)
  • Poor cross-instance reusability
  • Maintenance overhead grows rapidly

Best for: Basic regression testing needs with limited budget. Often used alongside other tools rather than as primary solution.

Why Virtuoso QA Composable Testing is the Most Complete EasyRepro Alternative

While each alternative addresses some EasyRepro limitations, Virtuoso QA Composable Testing for D365 solves the fundamental problem: test automation shouldn't require building from scratch.

1. The Composable Difference: Build Once, Deploy Everywhere

Traditional D365 test automation (including EasyRepro) follows this model:

  1. Analyze D365 process
  2. Write test scripts
  3. Debug and stabilize
  4. Deploy to environment
  5. Maintain when D365 updates
  6. Repeat for next instance

Timeline: 125+ days per instance

Virtuoso QA Composable Testing follows this model:

  1. Select pre-built tests for your D365 modules
  2. Configure for your environment
  3. Deploy to instance
  4. AI maintains automatically
  5. Reuse same tests for next instance

Timeline: 1-2 days per instance

2. Real Implementation Example

Company: Global manufacturing firm with D365 Finance & Operations

Challenge: Rolling out D365 to 8 factories across 4 countries Previous approach: EasyRepro custom framework

Results with EasyRepro:

  • Factory 1: 6 months to build 180 tests
  • Factory 2-8: 3 months each to rebuild and customize
  • Total: 27 months of QA effort
  • Annual maintenance: 480 hours fixing broken tests after updates

Results with Virtuoso QA Composable:

  • Factory 1: 2 weeks to deploy 700+ tests
  • Factory 2-8: 1 week each to configure and deploy same tests
  • Total: 9 weeks of QA effort
  • Annual maintenance: 15 hours of configuration updates

Outcome: 94% reduction in testing effort, $4.2M saved over 18 months.

Related Read: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Testing for Manufacturing

3. The Joy of Lego for D365 Professionals

Virtuoso QA Composable Testing works like Lego:

  • Pre-built blocks (700+ test assets)
  • Snap together for custom flows
  • Reuse blocks across multiple builds
  • Adapt blocks as needs change

You don't build Lego bricks from scratch. You don't build D365 tests from scratch either.

Migration Guide: Moving from EasyRepro to Virtuoso QA Composable

Many teams hesitate to switch because they've invested heavily in EasyRepro. Here's how migration actually works:

Week 1: Assessment & Import

  • Analyze existing EasyRepro test scenarios
  • Import test cases into Virtuoso QA (supports migration from code-based frameworks)
  • Identify which tests to keep vs. replace with pre-built assets

Week 2: Deploy Pre-Built Assets

  • Deploy Virtuoso QA's 700+ pre-built tests for your D365 modules
  • Configure tests for your specific environment
  • Run parallel testing (EasyRepro + Virtuoso QA)

Week 3: Parallel Validation

  • Execute both frameworks against same test scenarios
  • Compare coverage, stability, and execution time
  • Identify gaps or issues

Week 4: Transition

  • Keep EasyRepro tests that work reliably
  • Replace brittle/high-maintenance tests with Virtuoso QA equivalents
  • Retire EasyRepro tests gradually as confidence builds

Total migration timeline: 4 weeks

Total migration cost: Included with platform subscription

You're not replacing investment. You're protecting it by filling gaps and removing maintenance burden.

Cost Analysis: EasyRepro vs. Virtuoso QA Composable

EasyRepro Total Cost of Ownership (3 Years)

Initial Development:

  • QA Engineer time: 1,000 hours @ $80/hr = $80,000
  • Developer time: 400 hours @ $120/hr = $48,000
  • Year 1 Total: $128,000

Annual Maintenance:

  • Test maintenance: 400 hours @ $80/hr = $32,000
  • Framework updates: 100 hours @ $120/hr = $12,000
  • Annual Ongoing: $44,000

Multi-Instance Cost:

  • Each additional instance: 60-80% rebuild cost
  • 5 instances total: $128K + (4 × $90K) = $488,000

3-Year Total (5 instances): $744,000

Virtuoso QA Composable Total Cost of Ownership (3 Years)

Year 1:

  • Platform subscription: $60,000
  • Migration support: $15,000 (one-time)
  • Configuration: Included
  • Year 1 Total: $75,000

Years 2-3:

  • Platform subscription: $60,000/year
  • Maintenance: $0 (AI-powered)
  • Annual Ongoing: $60,000

Multi-Instance Cost:

  • Each additional instance: Configuration only (included)
  • 5 instances total: Same $60K/year covers all

3-Year Total (5 instances): $195,000

Savings: $549,000 (74% reduction)

Making the Decision: Is It Time to Switch from EasyRepro?

Consider moving to an EasyRepro alternative if you answer "yes" to 3+ questions:

  • Our QA team spends >30% of time maintaining tests instead of creating new coverage
  • Tests break with every D365 update and fixing them delays our release cycles
  • We're rolling out D365 to multiple instances and facing rebuild costs
  • Our test creation bottleneck is C# development resources
  • We have <50% automated regression coverage after 6+ months of effort
  • Business users can't understand what our tests actually validate
  • We're planning D365 expansion but dreading the test automation work
  • Our current test framework is delaying D365 adoption

If you have answered yes to 5+ questions, the cost of staying with EasyRepro likely exceeds the cost of switching to a modern alternative.

Conclusion: The Future of D365 Test Automation

EasyRepro served an important purpose as Microsoft's first serious attempt at providing D365 test automation guidance. But the market has evolved.

The best D365 test automation solutions in 2025 don't make you build from scratch. They provide:

  • Pre-built test assets for common D365 processes
  • AI-powered maintenance that adapts to D365 updates
  • Multi-instance architecture that eliminates duplicate work
  • Low-code interfaces that democratize test creation

Virtuoso QA Composable Testing represents this evolution - combining 700+ pre-built D365 tests with AI self-healing and multi-instance reusability.

The question isn't whether to move beyond EasyRepro. The question is: how much longer can your D365 implementation afford the build-from-scratch model?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can Virtuoso QA Composable Testing work with our customized D365 instance?

Yes. Virtuoso QA's pre-built tests are designed to be configurable, not rigid. The platform handles approximately 70% of standard D365 processes out-of-box. Your customizations (typically 30% of functionality) are addressed through:

  • Configuration options within existing tests
  • Modular test blocks you can adapt
  • Custom test creation for truly unique workflows

Most teams achieve 80-90% coverage using pre-built assets with configuration, then build custom tests only for highly specific customizations.

How does AI self-healing actually work?

When D365 updates change UI elements, Virtuoso QA's AI uses multiple identification strategies:

  1. Visual recognition (what the element looks like)
  2. Contextual analysis (where the element appears relative to other elements)
  3. Functional pattern matching (what the element does)

If the primary identifier fails, AI automatically tries alternate methods. Tests continue running while AI learns the new element identifiers. You review suggested changes and approve them - no manual selector hunting required.

What happens to our existing EasyRepro tests?

You have three options:

  1. Import and convert: Virtuoso QA can import test scenarios and recreate them using pre-built assets
  2. Run in parallel: Keep EasyRepro for specific tests while using Virtuoso QA for others
  3. Gradual replacement: Replace EasyRepro tests incrementally as Virtuoso QA assets are deployed

Most teams use option 3: keep EasyRepro tests that work well, replace high-maintenance tests immediately, transition remaining tests over 2-3 months.

Does this work for D365 Finance, Supply Chain, Commerce, and other modules?

Yes. Virtuoso QA Composable Testing includes pre-built test assets for:

  • D365 Finance: General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Fixed Assets, Budgeting, Cash & Bank Management, Financial Reporting
  • D365 Supply Chain: Procurement, Inventory Management, Production Control, Warehouse Management, Sales & Marketing, Master Planning
  • D365 Commerce: Point of Sale, E-commerce, Order Management, Merchandising
  • D365 HR: Employee Self-Service, Core HR, Benefits, Leave & Absence
  • D365 Project Operations: Project Management, Resource Scheduling, Time & Expense

Coverage varies by module maturity. Contact Virtuoso QA for specific module coverage details.

How long does implementation take compared to EasyRepro?

EasyRepro timeline:

  • Setup framework: 2-4 weeks
  • Build test automation: 4-6 months
  • Stabilize and debug: 1-2 months
  • Total: 6-9 months to production-ready state

Virtuoso QA Composable timeline:

  • Platform setup: 1-2 days
  • Deploy pre-built tests: 1-2 days
  • Configure for environment: 1-2 weeks
  • Parallel validation: 1-2 weeks
  • Total: 3-5 weeks to production-ready state

What's the learning curve for our QA team?

Most QA analysts are productive with Virtuoso QA within 1 week of training. The platform uses:

  • Plain English test steps (no C# or programming)
  • Visual test building interface
  • Point-and-click configuration

Compare to EasyRepro's 4-6 week ramp-up time for developers with C# experience.

Can we reuse tests across multiple D365 environments (dev, test, prod)?

Yes. Virtuoso QA tests are environment-agnostic by design. You configure environment-specific details (URLs, credentials, tenant IDs) separately from test logic. The same test library executes across:

  • Dev, Test, UAT, Production environments
  • Different D365 instances (factories, regions, subsidiaries)
  • Different D365 versions

What about security and compliance?

Virtuoso QA is SOC 2 Type II certified and supports:

  • SSO integration (Azure AD, Okta, etc.)
  • Role-based access control
  • Encrypted credential storage
  • Audit logging for all test executions
  • GDPR and data privacy compliance

Tests can run on-premise, in private cloud, or in Virtuoso QA's managed environment depending on your security requirements.

How does pricing work for multiple D365 instances?

Virtuoso QA pricing is based on D365 modules covered and number of test executions, not number of instances. The same subscription covers:

  • All your D365 instances globally
  • All environments (dev, test, UAT, prod)
  • Unlimited users

This contrasts with per-seat or per-instance licensing models from other vendors.

What if we have very specific D365 customizations?

Virtuoso QA's pre-built library covers standard D365 processes. For customizations:

  1. Use pre-built tests as templates and modify
  2. Create custom test blocks using low-code interface
  3. Engage Virtuoso QA professional services for complex scenarios

Most teams find 70-80% of their testing needs are met by pre-built assets, with custom tests needed only for proprietary business logic.

Can we integrate Virtuoso QA with our existing CI/CD pipeline?

Yes. Virtuoso QA integrates with:

  • Azure DevOps
  • Jenkins
  • GitHub Actions
  • GitLab CI
  • Bamboo
  • TeamCity

Tests can trigger automatically on D365 deployments, on schedule, or on-demand via REST API.

What support is included with Virtuoso QA?

Virtuoso QA includes:

  • 24/7 technical support
  • Dedicated customer success manager
  • Migration assistance from EasyRepro
  • Ongoing training and best practices
  • Access to D365 testing community
  • Regular platform updates and new pre-built tests

Subscribe to our Newsletter